|
||||||||||||
The procedure for appointing a Supreme Court Justice is provided for by the Constitution in only a few words. The "Appointments Clause" (Article II, Section 2, clause 2) states that the President "shall nominate, and by and with the Advise and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint…Judges of the supreme Court." The process of appointing Justices has undergone changes over two centuries, but its most basic feature--the sharing of power between the President and Senate--has remained unchanged. To receive lifetime appointment to the Court, a candidate must first be nominated by the President and then confirmed by the Senate. Although not mentioned in the Constitution, an important role is played midway in the process (after the President selects, but before the Senate considers) by the Senate Judiciary Committee. Since the end of the Civil War, almost every Supreme Court nomination received by the Senate has first been referred to and considered by the Judiciary Committee before being acted on by the Senate as a whole. | ||||||||||||
Table Of Contents |
Table of Contents
1. "Supreme Court Appointment Process: Roles of the President, Judiciary Committee, and Senate," Congressional Research Service (CRS) Report for Congress RL31989, February 19, 2010 (see CRS Report RL31989, September 3, 2010, 70-page PDF- Introduction3. "Evolution of the Senate's Role in the Nomination and Confirmation Process: A Brief History," CRS Report for Congress RL31948, May 13, 2009 . . . . . . 81
- Receipt and Referral
- Committee Procedures
- Written Rules
- Investigations
- Hearings
- Reporting
- Floor Procedures
- Executive Calendar
- Executive Session
- Taking Up A Nomination
- Holds
- Consideration and Disposition
- Recommital
- Reconsideration
- Cloture
- Nominations Returned to the President
- Recess Appointments
- Related CRS Reports
- Introduction4. "Proper Scope of Questioning of Supreme Court Nominees: The Current [2005] Debate," CRS Report for Congress RL33059, September 1, 2005 . . . . . . 97
- Development of Senate Procedures
- Senatorial Courtesy
- Blue Slips
- "Holds"
- Filibuster
- Historical Background5. "Constitutionality of a Senate Filibuster of a Judicial Nomination," CRS Report for Congress RL32102, June 14, 2005 . . . . . . 113
- Past Comments of John G. Roberts, Jr., on Proper Scope of Questioning
- His Advice in 1981 to Nominee Sandra Day O'Connor
- Questions He Declined to Answer as Court of Appeals Nominee in 2003
- Pre-Hearing Debate Over Proper Scope of Questioning for Roberts as Supreme Court Nominee
- Chairman Sets Stage for Committee Questioning
- Calls for Roberts to Answer Questions about Current Issues
- Criticism of Calls for Roberts to Answer Questions about Current Issues
- Conclusion
- Introduction6. "Cloture Attempts on Nominations," CRS Report for Congress RL32878, March 30, 2009 . . . . . . . 127
- Majority Rule
- Rulemaking Authority
- Entrenchment
- The Senate, the President, and Judicial Appointments
- The Text
- The Framers' Intent
- The Arguments of Supporters and Critics of Filibusters of Judicial Nominations
- Recess Appointments
- Appeal to the Courts
- Standing
- Political Question
- Conclusion
- Cloture, Filibusters, and How They Differ7. "Changing Senate Rules or Procedures: The 'Constitutional' or 'Nuclear' Option," CRS Report for Congress RL32684, November 1, 2005 . . . . . . 139
- Frequency of Cloture Attempts on Nominations
- Historical Development of Cloture Attempts on Nominations
- Positions in Relation to Which Cloture Was Sought
- Table 1. Cloture Attempts and Action on Nominations
- Table 2. Frequency and Success of Cloture Attempts on Nominations, by Time Period, 1949-2008
- Table 3. Cloture Action on Judicial and Executive Nominations, by Time Period, 1967-2008
- Table 4. Nominations Subjected to Cloture Attempts, 1968-2008
- Introduction8. "'Entrenchment' of Senate Procedure and the 'Nuclear Option' for Change: Possible Proceedings and Their Implications," CRS Report for Congress RL32843, March 28, 2005 . . . . . . . 153
- Nominations and the Filibuster
- Possible Courses of Action
- Dilatory Debate
- Opening Day Scenario One - Majority Rules Change
- Opening Day Scenario Two - Majority Cloture
- The Constitution and Cloture
- Considerations
- Potential Implications for the Senate
- Alternative Proposal
- Introduction9. "Consideration and Debate on the Senate Floor: Filibusters," "Cloture in Senate Floor Proceedings," "Steps to Invoke Cloture," and "Senate Procedures under Cloture," Sections 8.210-8.232, from the Congressional Deskbook, by Michael Koempel and Judy Schneider . . . . . . 189
- Filibusters and Limits on Consideration
- "Nuclear" and "Constitutional" Options
- Synopsis
- The "Entrenchment" of Senate Procedure
- Lack of Overall Consideration Limits
- Effects of the Continuing Body Doctrine
- The Continuity of the Senate
- Practical Implications of Continuity
- Contrast with the House of Representatives
- Entrenchment in Practice Only
- Requisites of a "Nuclear Option"
- Overcoming Entrenchment
- Consideration Limits Under Existing Procedures
- Motion to Table
- Point of Order
- Nested Point of Order
- Precedential Force of Parliamentary Rulings
- Rulings of the Chair
- Decisions by the Senate
- The "Constitutional Option"
- Rulemaking Power as Basis
- "Advice and Consent" Power as Basis
- Consideration Limits on Submitted Questions
- Possible Proceedings in a Contemporary "Nuclear Option"
- Point of Order Sustained by Chair
- Adverse Ruling in Accordance With Precedent
- Point of Order Submitted
- Point of Order by Opponents
- Nested Points of Order
- Implications of Using Extraordinary Action to Overcome Entrenchment
- Peremptory Departure from Established Procedure
- Extraordinary Action and the Standing of Precedent
- Attempts to Amend the Cloture Rule, 1953-1975
- Asserting the Non-Continuity of Rules
- Majority Cloture on Rules Changes
- Presumptively Non-Debatable Motion to Proceed
- Corresponding Considerations in the House
- Procedural Stability and Procedural Control
- Prospective Effects on Senate Practice
- Procedural Change Under Established Constraints
- For Further Reading
![]()
Audio CD and Print Materials/font> Online download with MP3 audio and materials in PDF Capitol Learning Audio Courses
Capitol Learning Audio Courses are a convenient way to learn about the legislative process, federal budgeting, media relations, business etiquette, and much more. Each course is between 1/2 hour and 2 hours long, and includes the course materials.Our Capitol Learning Audio Courses can be customized with your logo in quantities of 250 to 10,000 copies. Contact our Client Liaison for details.
- Congress and Its Role in Policymaking
- Presidential-Congressional Relations: Rivals Sharing Power
- Advocacy Campaigns for Nonprofits
- What Your Member of Congress Can Do for You: Gallery Passes, Flags, Presidential Greetings, and Help with Federal Agencies
Also see these related publications
TheCapitol.Net is a non-partisan firm, and the opinions of its faculty, authors, clients and of the owners and operators of its vendors are their own and do not represent those of TheCapitol.Net.
Book Preview
GBS_insertPreviewButtonPopup('ISBN:1587331586');
See larger image
(opens in new tab)
Find Supreme Court Nominations in a library near you.
var addthis_brand = "TheCapitol.Net";
Congressional Offices
Federal Agencies
Military
NGOs and Nonprofits
Diplomatic Corps
Fortune 500
Law Firms
Lobbying Firms
Labor Unions
Associations
_uacct = "UA-482433-1"; urchinTracker();