Upcoming courses and telephone seminars from TheCapitol.Net. Exclusive provider of Congressional Quarterly Executive Conferences

Exclusive provider of Congressional Quarterly Executive Conferences
 
Home Courses Convenience Learning Custom Training Publications Faculty and Authors Clients Store Client Care
Rave Reviews | Examination Copies | Potential Authors | Revised Editions | FAQs | Customization
 

Your Account Cart

Booklets
Common Sense Rules of Advocacy for Lawyers
Congressional Deskbook
Congressional Directory
Congressional Operations Poster
Federal Regulatory Process Poster
Legislative Drafter's Deskbook
Lobbying and Advocacy
Media Relations Handbook for Agencies, Associations, Nonprofit and Congress
Real World Research Skills
 
 Audio Courses on CD
 

In our Online Store

Legal Spectator & More
The Business Writer's Handbook
The Federal Budget Process
The Process of Legal Research
 
Current Catalog
Email Update
Suggestion Form
 
TheCapitol.Net
703-739-3790
1-877-228-5086
Fax: 703-739-1195
Email: use our web form


Media Relations Handbook 
for Agencies, Associations, Nonprofits and Congress

§ 10.6  Self-Research

By Brad Fitch
Foreword by Mike McCurry
Contributing Author: Beth Gaston

$45

Buy this publication

Ships within 1 business day.

The Author
Reviews
Sample Sections
Details


  § 10.6  Self-Research

One of the most valuable jobs a congressional press secretary can legally do to help the member's campaign is to conduct "self-research" on the member. The term "self-research" is similar to what campaigns do when probing into an opponent's background, known as "opposition research." This is one area, if done correctly, that the congressional ethics committees, outside watchdog groups, and even the media will never criticize--you're supposed to know your boss's record in Congress. Press secretaries can compile lists of the member's voting record and rationales behind positions and votes; organize speeches, statements or letters; and itemize accomplishments for the congressional district or state--any type of research that reviews the member's official activities.

One important ethical and legal note: How that data is used, and the degree of coordination between the campaign and the congressional office, may violate ethics rules, and congressional press secretaries should consult experts if they think they're getting close to the line. For example, it's perfectly legitimate to provide a constituent, the campaign staff, or a reporter with the list of the key environmental votes that the member of Congress has cast in the last two years. However, if the press secretary spends a Monday afternoon in the congressional office writing a three-page summary of the member's environmental record, and that summary is delivered word-for-word as a campaign direct-mail piece less than a week later, that might be interpreted as a misuse of official resources.

For more information on the rules and regulations governing the use of office staff during campaigns, consult The House Committee on Standards and Official Conduct's "Campaign Booklet," <www.house.gov/ethics/Campaign_booklet.htm>, and the Senate Select Committee on Ethics' "Ethics Manual," <http://ethics.senate.gov/downloads/pdffiles/manual.pdf>.

Campaigns are another reason why it's important for the press secretary to concentrate on the basics--create an ongoing research system that anyone can use, preferably in a computer database, so that it can be accessed in a variety of ways. The system can be used for a variety of purposes to assist in the official functioning of the office, in addition to aiding the campaign, and, therefore, cannot be viewed as solely created to assist in the re-election effort.

The key components of congressional self-research are:

Voting Record. A complete, searchable record of every vote cast by the member, with descriptions of the votes in layman's terms. The CQ (Congressional Quarterly) Weekly has the best terminology for explaining what the votes mean. Short rationales or accompanying statements should be prepared for any controversial or important vote.

Bills Introduced and Cosponsored. Tracking bills sponsored by the member is easy, since most offices thrive on this activity and keep Congressional Record statements, press releases, and other related matter. Tracking cosponsored legislation is sometimes a more difficult challenge. Some bills have hundreds of cosponsors, since members can easily add their support to any bill introduced and sometimes do it verbally without notifying staff. While databases exist (such as <www.congress.gov>) that easily track co-sponsorships of legislation, identifying the reason behind a member's decision to cosponsor legislation is another matter. Occasionally, when fielding a question from the campaign, a congressional legislative director will shout to the rest of her staff in a crowded office the question, "Does anyone have the faintest idea why the congressman cosponsored a bill declaring November the National Save the Curled-Toe Hippo Month?" The lesson here is: build and track the legislative record before you get the obscure calls.

Key Positions and Public Statements (Especially Press Clippings). Often members of Congress will articulate new positions in ad hoc public meetings or in conferences with newspaper editorial boards. These statements often result in small-town newspaper articles, and may be the only time the member has stated his position on this particular issue. Collecting and cataloguing these statements may be crucial to defending the member, especially if the opposition gets hold of these potentially incriminating statements.

Public Schedule. The member's past schedule should be prepared if anyone questions his activities--especially on days when he might have missed votes. Ideally, this is kept in a searchable database and can be catalogued by location, subject category, staff member present, and participants.

Accomplishments. Press secretaries and legislative staff should create comprehensive documents that catalogue the accomplishments of their member of Congress. Rather than rushing to complete these before each election, the compilation should be an ongoing collaborative task of the congressional legislative and press operations. Each accomplishment should include a brief paragraph describing the accomplishment, with longer documents created for more important achievements. Each item should include or refer to supporting documentation, such as the actual legislation, official correspondence, or other paper trail that proves the member actually was responsible for this achievement. Ideally, the hard copy of the supporting documents should be kept in a single file and the details should be logged into a searchable database that can be sorted by subject category, area of the state or community in the congressional district that benefits from the accomplishment, and priority to constituents or the member.

"Accomplishments" is probably the most important area of self-research and the most valuable to the campaign. It is also the one that comes closest to violating ethics rules and the law. According to congressional institutional rules and federal law, congressional offices can use official resources to document the activities of a member of Congress. However, staff cannot work for the member's campaign on the taxpayer's dime. Accomplishment memos can be provided to constituents, the media--even the campaign manager. But, if they are taken verbatim and turned into campaign literature, the congressional office and the campaign have crossed the line and opened themselves up to various investigations and penalties. If congressional press secretaries create the material that is going to be used verbatim by the campaign, they must do so on their own time and using their own resources or the campaign's resources.

There are other research areas related to the member's activities that campaigns often conduct. Some candidates will hire opposition research firms to do thorough self-research on themselves--background checks done just to make sure there's nothing in their records that may unknowingly spell disaster for their career. Past business dealings, unusual complaints from disgruntled employees, messy divorce proceedings, all can be dug up, for a price. And, in tight campaigns, no price is too high for a hungry opponent looking for a silver bullet to win a congressional seat. There is a vast amount of information available in the public record, and some campaigns will hire private investigators to dig it up. But those headaches are usually for the campaign press secretary, not the congressional press secretary.

The key to self-research in a congressional office is for the press secretary to spot potential problem areas in the official record--positions that are most likely to be attacked by an opponent, special-interest group, or the media. Being prepared to answer the tough questions isn't a misuse of taxpayer dollars, even if it helps your member's political career--it's part of your official responsibility to be the expert on every possible aspect of your member's official activities.

  Details

Media Relations Handbook
By Brad Fitch
Foreword by Mike McCurry
Contributing Author: Beth Gaston

$45
Plus shipping and handling (6% of order, $7.95 minimum).
Ships within 1 business day

Buy this publication

Hardbound: 368 pages 
ISBN 10: 1587330032
ISBN 13: 978-1-58733-003-2
LCCN:  2003113070
OCLC: 54982382
Published 2004
Dimensions: 7.2 x 10.25 x 1.1
Weight: 2.1 pounds
Discount for bookstores and classroom use.
VA sales tax added when shipped to VA address.  

Publication descriptions and Order form (10-page pdf)


 

  URLs:  www.TheCapitol.Net/Publications/mediarelationsSampSec10_6.html
www.MediaRelationsHandbook.com

Last updated: January 01, 2008

 
 

About Us | Legislative Glossary | Visiting DC | Privacy | Links | Email Updates | Contact Us | Search

TheCapitol.Net, Inc.

PO Box 25706, Alexandria, VA  22313-5706
Phone: 703-739-3790   Fax: 703-739-1195    Email Us

Copyright © 1999-2008 by TheCapitol.Net, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.