6. "The Role of Offsets in a Greenhouse Gas Emissions Cap-and-Trade Program: Potential Benefits and Concerns," CRS Report for Congress RL34436, May 18, 2009
. . . . . . 31
- Introduction
- Offsets: An Overview
- Offset Types and Examples
- Biological Sequestration
- Renewable Energy Projects
- Energy Efficiency
- Non-CO2 Emissions Reduction
- Potential Benefits of Offsets
- Cost-Effectiveness
- Potential Co-Benefits
- Potential Benefits to Developing Nations
- Other Potential Domestic Benefits
- Potential Concerns
- Integrity Concerns
- Additionality
- Measurement
- Double-Counting
- Permanence
- Leakage
- Delay of Technology Development
- Transaction Costs
- Concerns in Developing Nations
- Considerations for Congress
- Figure 1. Emission Allowance Price at Three Offset Scenarios Under Framework of S.
2191
- Figure 2. CERs Issued to Data by Project Type (as of May 1, 2009)
- Figure 3. 2012 Projections for CERs by Project Type (as of May 1, 2009)
- Table 1. Comparison of Offset Treatment in GHG Emission Control Proposals in the
111th Congress
- Table 2. Comparison of Offset Treatment in GHG Emission Control Proposals from the
110th Congress
- Table 3. Comparison of Offset Treatment in GHG Emissions Reduction Initiatives in the
U.S. States
- Table 4. Comparison of Offset Treatment in International Emissions Trading Programs
7. "Potential Offset Supply in a Cap-and-Trade Program," CRS Report for Congress RL34705, October 14, 2008 . . . . . . 65
- Introduction
- Factors Affecting Offset Supply
- Mitigation Potential
- Elements of Uncertainty
- Estimates from Agriculture and Forestry Activities
- Estimates from Other Activities
- Policy Choices
- Design of the Cap-and-Trade Program
- Actions in Other Nations or U.S. States
- Other Policy Influences
- Economic Factors
- Emission Allowance Price
- Other Factors
- Offset Use in a Cap-and-Trade Program
- Figure 1. Illustration of Inputs and Variables That Affect Potential Offset Supply
- Figure 2. Estimated Offset Use Under S. 2191 If International and Domestic Offsets
Limited to 15% of Allowance Submission
- Figure 3. Estimated Offset Use Under S. 2191 If Domestic and International Offset Use
Unlimited
- Figure 4. Estimated Offset Use Under S. 2191 If Domestic Offset Use Unlimited and
International Offset Use Limited to 15%
- Table 1. EPA and USDA Estimates of Mitigation Potential for Afforestation and Soil
Sequestration (in 2025)
- Table 2. EPA Estimates of Mitigation Potential for Other Agriculture and Forestry
Activities (in 2025)
- Table 3. EPA Estimates of Mitigation Potential from Other Activities (in 2010)
8.
"Allowance Markets Assessment: A Closer Look at the Two Biggest Price Changes in the Federal SO2 and NOX Allowance Markets," U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, April 23, 2009 . . . . . . . 85
9. "Carbon Tax and Greenhouse Gas
Control: Options and Considerations for Congress," CRS Report for
Congress R40242, March 10, 2009
. . . . . . . 95
- Introduction
- Cost or Quantity Control: An Overview
- Economic Theory vs. Uncertainty
- A Stark Choice or a Policy Continuum?
- A Flexible Emissions Cap
- A Flexible Carbon Tax
- Limits of the Policy Continuum
- Potential Advantages of a Carbon Tax
- Economic Efficiency
- Basis for the Argument
- Underpinnings of the Argument
- Modeled Efficiency Gains
- Economic Efficiency Versus Precaution
- Price Stability
- Tax Revenue Applications
- Potential Implementation Advantages
- Transparency
- Administrative Issues
- Policy Modification
- Potential Disadvantages
- Uncertain Emissions
- Political Feasibility
- What’s in a Name?
- Support from Industry?
- Support from Environmental Groups?
- Consideration of International Efforts and Cooperation
- Coordination with Existing International Efforts
- Maximizing Participation
- International Implementation Concerns
- Implementation of a Carbon Tax
- Point of Taxation
- Where to Impose a Carbon Tax?
- CO2 Emissions or All GHG Emissions?
- Which Emissions Sources to Control?
- Level of Taxation
- Tax Based on Estimates of Costs and Benefits
- Tax Based on Meeting an Emissions Target
- Tax Revenue Distribution
- Estimates of Tax Revenues
- Uses of Tax Revenues
- Policy Considerations of Different Revenue Applications
- Distributional Impacts
- Conclusions
- Figure 1. Illustration of Price Versus Quantity
- Figure 2. Bridging the Gap between Price and Quantity Control
- Figure 3. Illustrative Scenario with a Relatively Flat Marginal Benefits Curve
- Figure 4. Illustrative Scenario with a Relatively Steep Marginal Benefits Curve
- Figure 5. Illustrative Scenario with Marginal Costs and Marginal Benefits That Are
Higher Than Expected
- Figure 6. “Phase 2” Emission Allowance Prices in the European Union’s Emission
Trading System
- Figure 7. Illustration of Options for Points of Taxation within the Energy Production-to-
Consumption Chain
- Figure 8. Emission Allowance Price Estimates under S. 2191
- Figure 9. Relative Differences in Efficiency Costs between Different Applications of Tax
(or Auction) Revenues and No-Cost Allowance Distribution in a Cap-and-Trade Program
- Figure A-1. Illustration of Relationship between the Stock of CO2 in Atmosphere and
Annual CO2 Emissions
- Table 1. CO2 Emissions Per Unit of Energy for Fossil Fuels
- Table 2. Selected Sources of U.S. GHG Emissions and Potential Applications of a
Carbon Tax
- Table 3. Estimates of Potential Tax Revenues from Carbon Tax Proposals from the 110th
Congress (in 2005 dollars)
- Table 4. Distributional Effects of Carbon Tax with Different Applications of Carbon Tax
Revenues
- Table A-1. Comparison of Estimated Carbon Tax-Related Price Impacts to Fossil Fuels
and Motor Gasoline from Selected Carbon Tax Rates
- Appendix. Additional Information
10. "The Carbon Cycle: Implications
for Climate Change and Congress,"
CRS Report for Congress RL34059, February 18, 2009
. . . . . 147
- Introduction
- Carbon Storage, Sources, and Sinks
- Carbon Flux, or Exchange, with the Atmosphere
- How Much Carbon Is Exchanged
- How Fast Carbon Is Exchanged
- Land Surface-Atmosphere Flux
- The “Missing Sink”
- Ocean-Atmosphere Flux
- Policy Implications
- Figure 1. (a) Storage or Pools (GtC); and (b) Annual Flux or Exchange of Carbon (GtC
per year)
- Table 1. Carbon Stocks in the Atmosphere, Ocean, and Land Surface, and Annual
Carbon Fluxes
11. "Measuring and Monitoring Carbon
in the Agricultural and Forestry Sectors," CRS Report for Congress RS22964, August
6, 2009
. . . . . . . 161
- Purpose of Measuring Forest and Agricultural Carbon
- Decisions Needed in Setting Measurement Requirements
- Scale and Baseline
- Periodicity
- Verification
- Measurement Techniques
- On-Site Measurement
- Indirect Measurement with Off-Site Tools
- Estimation Using Process Models or Inferences
- Considerations for Congress
- Appendix. Forestry and Agricultural Activities for Carbon Sequestration and/or Emission
Reduction
12. "Climate Change: The Role of the
U.S. Agriculture Sector and Congressional Action," CRS Report for Congress RL33898, November 9, 2009
. . . . . . . 183
- Agricultural Emissions and Sinks
- Source of National Estimates
- Agricultural Emissions
- Direct Emissions
- Electricity-Related Emissions
- Land Use and Forestry Emissions
- Uncertainty Estimating Emissions
- Potential for Additional Emission Reductions
- Agricultural Carbon Sinks
- Carbon Loss and Uptake
- Agriculture-Based Sequestration
- Other Land Use and Forestry Sequestration
- Uncertainty Estimating Carbon Sinks
- Potential for Additional Uptake
- Enhancing Carbon Sinks
- Conservation Practices that Promote Mitigation
- Federal Programs
- Conservation Programs
- Other Farm Programs
- State Programs
- Agriculture Conservation and Land Management Programs
- State and Regional Climate Initiatives
- Congressional Action
- Energy and Climate Legislative Proposals
- 2008 Farm Bill Provisions
- Considerations for Congress
- Figure 1. Agricultural GHG Emissions, Average 2003-2007
- Figure 2. National Distribution of Anaerobic Digester Energy Production
- Figure 3. Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Soils
- Figure 4. USDA Conservation Spending, FY2005
- Table 1. Estimated Current GHG Emissions and Carbon Sequestration: U.S. Agricultural
and Forestry Activities, Average 2003-2007
- Table 2. Carbon Sequestration Potential in the U.S. Agriculture Sector, Alternative
Scenarios and Payment Levels
- Table 3.Conservation and Land Management Practices
- Appendix. Primer on Agriculture’s Role in the Climate Change Debate
13. "Forest Carbon Markets: Potential
and Drawbacks," CRS Report for Congress RL34560,
July 3, 2008
. . . . . . . 219
- Forest Carbon Markets
- Compliance Offset Markets
- Kyoto Protocol
- European Union’s Emission Trading Scheme
- Regional Initiatives in the United States
- Mandatory U.S. State Requirements
- Proposals in the 110th Congress
- Voluntary Offset Markets
- Retail Offsets
- Chicago Climate Exchange
- Reporting and Registry Programs
- 1605(b) Reporting Program
- California Registry
- The Climate Registry
- USDA Guidelines
- Forestry Projects for Offsets
- Afforestation and Reforestation
- Long-Term Wood Products
- Forest Management
- Avoided Deforestation
- Potential Drawbacks of Forestry-Related Projects
- Additionality
- Verifiability
- Measurement
- Monitoring
- Enforcement
- Leakage
- Emissions Leakage
- Product Leakage
- Permanence
- Forward Crediting
- Figure 1. Trading Volume and Market Value of the Clean Development Mechanism
(2005-2007)
- Figure 2. Estimated U.S. GHG Mitigation Totals by Activity: Annualized Averages, 2010-
2110
14. "Methane Capture: Options for
Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction,"
CRS Report for Congress R40813, September 17, 2009
. . . . . . 239
- Introduction
- Policy Options for Addressing Methane Capture
- Market-Based Emission Control Programs
- Carbon Offsets
- Emission Performance Standards
- Maintain Existing Programs/Incentives
- Legislative Proposals Concerning Methane Capture
- Methane: A Primer
- Global Warming Potential
- Sources of Methane
- Domestic
- International
- Methane Use and Storage
- Opportunities and Challenges for Methane Capture
- Agriculture
- Landfill Gas
- Oil and Natural Gas
- Coalbed Methane
- Concerns Applicable to All Sources
- Federal Support for Methane Capture
- Methane-to-Markets Partnership
- Voluntary Methane Programs
- Federal Energy Management Program
- Tax Incentives
- DOE Methane Hydrate Research and Development
- Figure 1. 2007 U.S. Sources of Anthropogenic Methane Emissions
- Figure 2. U.S. Underground Natural Gas Storage Facilities, Close of 2007
- Table 1. Selected Sources of U.S. Methane Emissions and Potential Number of Entities
Subject to Emission Control Program
- Table 2. Selected Legislation Proposed in the 111th Congress Relevant to Methane
- Table 3. Top Five Methane-Emitting Countries in 2005
- Table 4. U.S. Methane Emissions by Source
15. "Cars and Climate: What Can EPA Do
to Control Greenhouse Gases from Mobile Sources?" CRS Report for Congress R40506, December 9,
2009
. . . . . . . 263
- Introduction
- Option 1: Cap-and-Trade
- Option 2: A Carbon (or GHG) Tax
- Option 3: Regulation Under Existing Authority
- The Entry Point: Massachusetts vs. EPA
- The ANPR
- The Obama Administration's Approach
- Going After Mobile Sources: Title II Authorities
- New Motor Vehicles
- Ships
- Other Nonroad Engines
- Aircraft
- Fuels
- Summary of Mobile Source and Fuel GHG Emissions
- Figure 1. Motor Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions
- Table 1. Petitions for Regulation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Under the Clean Air Act
- Table 2. Motor Vehicle GHG Emissions, 2007, by Source Category
- Table 3. Nonroad Sector CO2 Emissions, 2007, by Source Category
16. "Aviation and Climate Change," CRS Report for Congress R40090, August 4,
2009
. . . . . . . 285
- Introduction
- Aircraft Emissions
- Reducing Emissions: Non-Regulatory Factors
- Fuel Cost
- Air Traffic Control
- Regulating Aircraft Under the Clean Air Act
- Proposed Legislation
- International Developments
- European Union
- ICAO
- Conclusion
- Table 1. CO2 Emissions from U.S. Aviation, 1990-2007
- Table 2. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from U.S. Transportation Sectors, 1990-2007
17.
"Cap and Trade Programs for Air Emissions," by Sam Napolitano, Clean Air Markets Division, Office of Air and Radiation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Presentation for the Clean Air Conference, December 4, 2009
. . . . . . . 299
18.
"Climate Change and the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS):
Kyoto and Beyond," CRS Report for Congress
RL34150, November 24, 2008
. . . . . . . 321
- Overview
- National Allocation Plans and the ETS
- Need for Further Emissions Reductions
- Need to Adjust ETS Allocations
- Issues Arising in Phase 2 NAPs for the ETS
- Supplementarity
- Auction Policy
- New Entrant Reserves
- Closure Policy
- Benchmarking
- Allocation and Energy Policy
- Looking to Phase III
- Eliminating NAPs
- Expanding Coverage
- Auctions
- Summary and Considerations for U.S. Cap-and-Trade Proposals
- Emission Inventories and Target Setting
- Coverage
- Allocation Schemes
- Flexibility and Price Volatility
- Figure 1. ECX CFI Futures Contracts: Price and Volume
- Figure 2. EU-15 Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Projections for the Kyoto Period: 2008-
2012
- Table 1. ETS Annual Allocations for Phase 2: 2008-2012
- Table 2. JI/CDM Limits for Phase 2: 2008-2012
- Table 3. Value of Annual Allocation for New NGCC Powerplant
- Table 4. Annual ETS Cap Figures for Proposed Phase 3
19. "Climate Change: Potential
Regulation of Stationary Greenhouse Gas Sources Under the
Clean Air Act," CRS
Report for Congress R40585, December 10, 2009
. . . . . . 349
- Introduction
- The Entry Point: Massachusetts vs. EPA
- The Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR)
- Potential Implications for Stationary Sources
- Potential Paths for GHG Stationary Source Control
- Path 1: Regulating GHG through National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS
- Importance of NAAQS
- NAAQS and Controlling GHGs
- Path 2: Regulating GHGs through Section 112 as Hazardous Air Pollutants
- Importance of Section 112
- Section 112 and Controlling GHGs
- Path 3: Regulating GHGs through Sections 111 as Designated Air Pollutants
- Importance of Section 111
- Controlling GHG through Section 111
- Going Off the Beaten Path: Regulating under Section 115 or Title VI
- Section 115: International Pollution
- Title VI: Stratospheric Ozone Protection
- Potential Control Approaches for Stationary Sources
- Forcing Commercialization of Technology Through a Regulatory Requirement: An
Example from the SO2 New Source Performance Standards
- Potential for Cap-and-Trade
- Potential Under Section 111
- Potential Under Other Sections
- Implementation Issues
- New Source Review
- Issue of Case-by-Case BACT Determinations
- Title V and the Size Threshold
- Section 304: Citizen Suits
- Conclusion
- Figure 1. Number of FGD Units and Cumulative Gigawatt (GW) Capacity of FGD Units:
1973-1996
- Table 1. Selected U.S. Stationary Sources of Greenhouse Gases
- Table 2. Simplified Requirements under Title I for Most Stationary Sources
20. Testimony of David L. Sokol,
Chairman, MidAmerican Energy Holdings Company Before the
Subcommittee on Energy and Environment, Committee on Energy
and Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives, June 9, 2009
. . . . . . . 383
21. Testimony of Dr. Richard Newell,
Administrator, Energy Information Administration, U.S.
Department of Energy before the Committee on Energy and
Natural Resources, U.S. Senate, October 14, 2009
. . . . . . . 407
22. Testimony of Robert Greenstein,
Executive Director, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities,
House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on
Energy and Environment, March 12, 2009
. . . . . . . 423
23.
Testimony of Sonny Popowsky, Consumer Advocate of
Pennsylvania Before the House Committee on Energy and
Commerce, Subcommittee on Energy and Environment, March 12,
2009
. . . . . . . 439
24.
Testimony of Steven L. Kline, Vice President, Corporate Environmental and Federal Affairs, PG&E Corporation Before the Subcommittee on Energy and Environment of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, March 12, 2009
. . . . . . 451
25. Testimony of Michael Carey, President, Ohio Coal
Association Before the Subcommittee on Energy and
Environment of the House Energy and Commerce Committee,
March 12, 2009
. . . . . . . 461
26.
Testimony of Dr. A. Denny Ellerman, Center for
Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, Before the Senate Committee on
Energy and Natural Resources, October 21, 2009
. . . . . . . 467
27. Testimony of Gilbert E. Metcalf,
Professor of Economics, Tufts University, Before the Senate
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, October 21, 2009
. . . . . . . 483
28. Testimony of Karen Palmer, Darius
Gaskins Senior Fellow, Resources for the Future, Before the
Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, October
21, 2009
. . . . . . . 495
29. Testimony of Dr. Chad Stone, Chief
Economist, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Before
the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources,
October 21, 2009
. . . . . . 505
30. Testimony of Ray Kopp, Senior Fellow and Director,
Climate Policy Program, Resources for the Future, Before the
Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, December
2, 2009
. . . . . . . 519
31. "Testimony of Ted Gayer, Brookings Institution,
Before the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources,
December 2, 2009
. . . . . . . 525
32. Testimony of Jonathan M.
Banks, Climate Policy Coordinator, Clean Air Task Force,
Before the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources,
December 2, 2009
. . . . . . . 529
33. Other Resources
From TheCapitol.Net . . . . . 539
Live
Courses
-
Capitol Hill Workshop
www.CapitolHillWorkshop.com
-
Understanding Congressional Budgeting and Appropriations
www.CongressionalBudgeting.com
-
Advanced Federal Budget Process
www.BudgetProcess.com
-
The President's Budget
www.PresidentsBudget.com
- The Defense Budget
www.TheDefenseBudget.com
Capitol
Learning Audio Courses TM
www.CapitolLearning.com
-
The Appropriations Process in a Nutshell, ISBN:
1587330431
-
Authorizations and Appropriations in a Nutshell,
ISBN: 1587330296