FY2010 Defense Authorization and Appropriations (Softcover and ebook) Including Selected Military Personnel Policy Issues, and The Cost of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Other Global War on Terror Operations Since 9/11
Compiled by TheCapitol.Net
For the
Department of Defense (DOD) in FY2010, the Administration
requested a total of $663.8 billion in discretionary budget
authority. This includes $533.8 billion for the so-called "base
budget"--all DOD activities other than combat operations--and
$130.0 billion for "overseas contingency operations," including
operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Administration also
requested $75.9 billion in supplemental DOD appropriations for
FY2009 to cover war costs. The Administration's DOD request,
made public May 7, 2009, incorporated Defense Secretary Robert
Gates' April 6 recommendations to curtail funding for several
major weapons programs focused on conventional warfare.
The
FY2010 national defense authorization bills drafted by the House
and Senate Armed Services Committees generally supported this
shift in policy, which the Obama Administration's budget request
reflected. However, both committees added to their respective
bills authorization to continue production of the Air Force's
F-22 fighter, and to continue development of an alternative
engine for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. The Obama
Administration warned that a bill that continued either program
would be vetoed. On June 25, the House passed by a vote of
389-22 its version of the FY2010 national defense authorization
act, H.R. 2647, which would authorize a total of $534.0 billion
for the DOD base budget--$264.8 million more than requested--and
$129.3 billion for war costs. The bill also would authorize
$16.5 billion for defense-related nuclear activities of the
Energy Department, which was $83.3 million more than requested.
On July 2, 2009, the Senate Armed Services Committee reported
its version of the authorization bill, S. 1390, which would
authorize $534.6 billion for the DOD base budget, $129.3 billion
for war costs, and $16.4 billion for the Energy Department. The
Senate passed the bill July 23, 2009, by a vote of 87-7 after
adopting several amendments, including two that would, in
effect, end production of the F-22 and terminate the F-35
alternate engine programs, as the Administration had requested.
The conference report on the authorization bill authorizes a
total of $680.2 billion for military activities of the
Department of Defense (DOD) and defense-related activities of
other federal agencies, which is $14.9 million more than the
Obama Administration requested. The conference report, which
terminates the F-22 but continues the alternate engine program,
was adopted by the House on October 8, 2009, by a vote of
281-146. The Senate adopted the conference report October 22,
2009, by a vote of 68-29 and President Obama signed the bill
(P.L. 111-84) on October 28. The House passed its version of the
FY2010 defense appropriations bill (H.R. 3326) on July 30, 2009,
by a vote of 400-30. The bill would appropriate $497.6 billion
for the DOD base budget (covering all accounts except military
construction) and $128.2 billion for FY2010 war costs. As
reported July 24, 2009, by the House Appropriations Committee,
the bill would have continued F-22 production and the F-35
alternate engine programs. But the House adopted a floor
amendment that would have the effect of terminating F-22
production.
The Senate Appropriations Committee reported September 10 an
amended version of H.R. 3326 which would appropriate $497.6
billion for the DOD base budget and $128.2 billion for war
costs. The committee bill funded neither continued F-22
production nor the F-35 alternate engine. During floor debate,
the Senate rejected two amendments that would have eliminated
$2.5 billion for the purchase of 10 C-17 cargo planes, which the
Senate committee added over the Administration's objection. The
Senate passed the bill October 6, 2009, by a vote of 93-7.
1. "Defense: FY2010 Authorization and Appropriations,"
Congressional Research Service (CRS) Report for Congress R40567,
December 14, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
- Most Recent Developments - Defense Authorization
Conference - Conference Issues in Defense Appropriations
Bill (H.R. 3326) - Overview of the Administration's
FY2010 Request - Status of Legislation - War Costs and
Issues - Debate About Potential Troop Increases in
Afghanistan - Basis and Status of War Cost Request in
Pending Legislation - Authorization Action on War Funding
Request - Changes to DOD's Request - Extensions and
Additional Reporting Requirements - House-Passed and
Senate-Passed Appropriations Action - Assessing
Uncertainties In Operations Funding - Funding for Force
Protection Vehicles - Transfers from Funding in the Base
Budget - Coalition Support and Commanders Emergency
Response Program Funding - Funding for Training Afghan
Security Forces and for Guantanamo Bay - Base Budget:
Comparison and Context - Defense Priorities: Budget and
Strategy - Background: Strategic Direction - Strategic
Processes - Issues for Congress: Secretary Gates's
Proposals - Quality of Life Issues - End-Strength
Increase - Health Care and Family Support - Preparing
for "The Wars We're In" - Intelligence, Reconnaissance,
and Surveillance (ISR) - Developing Partner Capacity
(Section 1206) - Army Brigade Combat Teams - Special
Operations Forces - Helicopter Crew Training -
Shipbuilding--Request - Aircraft Carriers - DDG-1000
and DDG-51 Destroyers - CG(X) Cruiser - Littoral
Combat Ship (LCS) - LPD-17, Mobile Landing Platform
(MLP), and Joint High Speed Vessel (JHSV) -
Aircraft-Request - Tactical Combat Aircraft (F-35, F-22,
F/A-18) - F-22 Raptor - Air Mobility (KC-X, C-17) -
Acquisition Reform (VH-71, CSAR-X) - Missile
Defense--Request - Theater Defenses (THAAD, SM-3, Aegis)
- Ground-Based National Missile Defense - Boost-Phase
Defenses (Airborne Laser and KEI) - Congressional
Perspectives - Ground Combat Systems (FCS and
EFV)--Request - Congressional Perspectives -
Bill-by-Bill Synopsis of Congressional Action to Date -
FY2010 Congressional Budget Resolution - National Defense
Authorization Act (H.R. 2647, S. 1390) - Ballistic
Missile Defense--Authorization -
Shipbuilding--Authorization - Combat
Aircraft--Authorization - Ground Combat
Systems--Authorization - Military Personnel Policy:
End-Strength, Pay Raise - DOD Civilian Employees: NSPS,
A-76 - Concurrent Receipt - Military Commissions,
Detainees and Guantanamo Bay - Hate Crimes (Title XLVII)
- Economic Development Conveyance of Surplus Real Property
(BRAC) - Guam Realignment - Other Senate Provisions
- FY2010 Defense Appropriations Bill - Ballistic Missile
Defense--Appropriation - Shipbuilding--Appropriation -
Aircraft--Appropriation - Ground Combat
Systems--Appropriation - Other Provisions
- Table 1. DOD Base Budget Request Discretionary Budget
Authority, FY2009-2010 - Table 2. Status of FY2010
Defense Authorization Bills, H.R. 2647/S. 1390 - Table 3.
Status of FY2010 Defense Appropriations Bills (H.R. 3326)
- Table 4. Congressional Action on DOD's War FY2010 Budget
Request - Table 5. Actual and Projected DOD Base Budgets
Compared with 4% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) - Table
6. DOD Discretionary Budget Authority, FY1998-FY2009 -
Table 7. FY2010 National Defense Authorization Act, House
and Senate Action by Title, H.R. 2647, S. 1390 - Table 8.
FY2010 Defense Appropriations Act (H.R. 3326) Summary by
Title - Table A-1. Congressional Action on FY2010 Missile
Defense Funding: Authorization - Table A-2. Congressional
Action on FY2010 Missile Defense Funding: Appropriations
- Table A-3. Congressional Action on Selected FY2010 Army
and Marine Corps Programs: Authorization - Table A-4.
Congressional Action on Selected FY2010 Army and Marine
Corps Programs: Appropriations - Table A-5. Congressional
Action on Selected FY2010 Shipbuilding Programs:
Authorization - Table A-6. Congressional Action on FY2010
Shipbuilding Programs: Appropriations - Table A-7.
Congressional Action on Selected FY2010 Navy, Marine Corps
and Air Force Aircraft Programs: Authorization - Table
A-8. Congressional Action on Selected FY2010 Navy, Marine
Corps, and Air Force Aircraft Programs: Appropriations -
Table A-9. Congressional Action on FY2010 DOD War Funding
Request (Defense Appropriations and Military Construction
Appropriations Bills)
- Appendix. Program Funding Tables
2. "FY2010 National Defense Authorization Act: Selected
Military Personnel Policy Issues," CRS Report for Congress
R40711, August 27, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
- Background - Active Duty End Strengths - Military
Pay Raise - Expansion of Concurrent Receipt -
Inclusion of Qualifying Service Since September 11, 2001, in
Calculating Eligibility for Early Receipt of Reserve Retired
Pay - Prohibition on Recruiting or Retaining Individuals
Associated with Hate Groups - Earlier Tricare Prime
Eligibility for Certain Reservists - Post-Deployment
Mental Health Screening - Constructive Eligibility for
Tricare Benefits for Individuals Otherwise Ineligible Under
Retroactive Determination of Medicare Part A Entitlement
- Tricare Coverage for Certain Members of the Retired
Reserve Who Are Not Yet Age 60 - Chiropractic Health Care
for Members on Active Duty - Dental Care for Survivors
- Prohibition on Conversions of Military Medical Positions
to Civilian and Dental Positions - Cooperative Health
Care Agreements Between Military Installations and
Non-Military Health Care Systems - Sexual Assault -
Government Accountability Office Report on the Progress Made
in Implementing Recommendations to Reduce Domestic Violence
in Military Families - Internship Pilot Program for
Military Spouses - Language and Cultural Training -
Survivor Benefit Plan Offset and Dependency and Indemnity
Compensation - Supplemental Assistance Allowance -
Civilian Employer-sponsored Health Care for Retired Military
Employees - Suicide Among Members of the Individual Ready
Reserve - Plan to Increase the Behavioral Health
Capabilities of the Department of Defense - Reform and
Improvement of the Tricare Program
- Table 1. Authorized Active Duty End Strengths
3. "The Cost of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Other Global War on
Terror Operations Since 9/11," CRS Report for Congress RL33110,
September 28, 2009. . . . . . 153
- Introduction - Total War Funding Enacted - Total War
Costs if FY2010 Request is Approved - Pending FY2010
Request - Potential Troop Increases in Afghanistan -
War Cost Issues in the 111th Congress - War Cost
Estimates for Iraq and Afghanistan - Problems with
Reliability of DOD's Estimates by Operation - Estimates
of War-Related Budget Authority - Funding for Each Agency
- Trends in War Funding - Estimates for Iraq and
Afghanistan and Other Operations - CBO Projections of
Future Costs - Past Trends and Future DOD Costs in Iraq
- Past Trends and Future DOD Costs in Afghanistan - Past
Trends and Future Costs in Enhanced Security - DOD
Spending Thus Far - Changes in Average Monthly
Obligations - Troop Level Changes in the Bush and Obama
Administrations - Funding to Train and Equip Iraqi and
Afghan Security Forces - Reset and Reconstitution -
DOD Changes Definition of War Costs - Procurement Funding
in FY2007 and FY2008 - Front Loading Reset Funding -
Carryover of DOD War Investment Funding - Accuracy and
Expansion of Reconstitution Requests - Modularity as an
Emergency Expense - Growing the Force as a War Cost -
Questions About War-Related Procurement Issues -
Potential Readiness Issues - Congressional Options to
Affect Military Operations - Problems in War Cost
Estimates and Reporting - Difficulties in Explaining
DOD's War Costs - Changes in Troop Strength - Reliance
on Reservists Falls - Changes in Military Personnel Costs
- Changes in Operating Costs - Changes in Investment
Costs - Special Funds and the Flexibility Issue -
Average Cost Per Deployed Troop and Future Costs -
Estimates of Future Costs
- Figure 1. Active-Duty and Reserve Shares of OIF/OEF
Average Annual Troop Levels, FY2003-Early FY2007
- Table 1. Estimated War Funding by Operation:
FY2001-FY2010 War Request - Table 2. Estimated War
Funding by Agency: FY2001-FY2010 - Table 3. Budget
Authority for Iraq, Afghanistan, and Other Global War on
Terror (GWOT) Operations: FY2001-FY2010 Request - Table
4. DOD's Obligations by Operation: FY2001-FY2009 - Table
5. Afghan and Iraq Security Forces Funding: FY2004-FY2009
Bridge - Table 6. Average Troop Strength for Iraq,
Afghanistan, and Other Counter-Terror Operations,
FY2001-FY2007 - Table 7. DOD's War Enacted Budget
Authority by Title: FY2004-FY2009 Bridge - Table 8.
Average Annual Cost Per Deployed Troop: FY2003-FY2006 -
Table A-1. Chronology of FY2008 War and FY2009 War Requests
- Table A-2. Enacted FY2008 and FY2009 War Funding -
Table B-1. Ways To Extend How Long Army Can Operate Without
FY2008 Supplemental Appropriations - Table C-1. Defense
Department, Foreign Operations Funding, and VA Medical
Funding for Iraq, Afghanistan and Other Global War on Terror
Activities, FY2001-FY2009
- Appendix A. Congressional Action on FY2008 and FY2009
War Funding - Appendix B. DOD Tools to Extend Financing
War Cost - Appendix C. War Appropriations by Act and by
Agency
4. Other Resources From TheCapitol.Net
. . . . . . . . 221
Capitol Learning
Audio Courses
are a convenient way to learn about the legislative process,
federal budgeting, media relations, business etiquette, and
much more. Each course is between 1/2 hour and 2 hours
long, and includes the course materials.
TheCapitol.Net is a non-partisan firm, and the opinions of its
faculty, authors, clients and of the owners and operators of its
vendors are their own and do not represent those of TheCapitol.Net.